Gender identity, social influence and children’s conversations

Leman, P. J and Duveen, G

(2003)

Leman, P. J and Duveen, G (2003) Gender identity, social influence and children’s conversations. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62 (3).

Our Full Text Deposits

Full text access: Open

Full Text - 92.09 KB

Links to Copies of this Item Held Elsewhere


Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between gender, processes of argumentation and cognitive change in children’s social interaction. 120 children (average age, 9.5 years) discussed a moral dilemma with a same age peer. The style of children’s conversations differed between same sex (boy-boy and girl-girl) pairs and boy-girl pairs suggesting that social status forms of influence (stemming from a child’s gender identity) can act to obstruct the effective communication and acceptance of certain arguments (or more epistemic aspects of influence) in conversation. Further analysis of conversations points to the importance of addressing differences in perspectives when reaching agreement on this “developmental” task. Results are discussed with reference to children’s representations and resolutions of socio-cognitive conflict.

Information about this Version

This is a Published version
This version's date is: 2003
This item is not peer reviewed

Link to this Version

https://repository.royalholloway.ac.uk/items/88170f6d-e54a-d4ac-a65a-c1afc4834ac4/1/

Item TypeJournal Article
TitleGender identity, social influence and children’s conversations
AuthorsLeman, P. J
Duveen, G
Uncontrolled Keywordsargument, children, conflict, gender, interaction
DepartmentsFaculty of Science\Psychology

Identifiers

doi10.1024//1421-0185.62.3.149

Deposited by () on 23-Dec-2009 in Royal Holloway Research Online.Last modified on 23-Dec-2009

References

Ames, G. J. & Murray, F. B. (1982). When two wrongs make a right: promoting cognitive change by social conflict. Developmental Psychology, 18, 894-897.
Bar-Tal, D. (1998). Persuasion, epistemic process and development: Comments to Leman’s article. Papers on Social Representations, 7, 57-60.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
Doise, W. & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergammon,
Doise, W., Mugny, G. & Pérez, J. A. (1998). The social construction of knowledge: social marking and sociocognitive conflict. In U. Flick (Ed.), The psychology of the social (pp.77-90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doise, W., Mugny, G. & Perret-Clermont, A-N. (1975). Social interaction and the developmnet of cognitive operations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5 367-383.
Duveen, G. (1997). Psychological development as a social process. In L. Smith, J. Dockerell & P.Tomlinson (Eds.), Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond (pp.158-173). London: Routledge.
Greenfield, P. M. & Lave, J. (1982). Cognitive aspects of informal education. In D. A. Wagner & H. W. Stephenson (Eds.), Cultural perspectives on child development (pp. 57-89). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Howe, C. J., Rodgers, C. & Tolmie, A. (1990). Physics in the primary school: peer interaction and the understanding of floating and sinking. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 5, 459-475.
Howe, C. J., Tolmie, A. & Rodgers, C. (1992). The acquisition of conceptual knowledge in science by primary school children: group interaction and the understanding of motion down an incline. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 113-130.
Kruger, A. C. (1992). The effect of peer and adult-child transactive discussions on moral reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38(2), 191-211.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leman, P. J. (1998). Social relations, social influence and the development of knowledge. Papers on Social Representations, 7, 41-56.
Leman, P. J. (2002). Argument structure, argument content and cognitive change in children’s peer interaction. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(1), 40-56.
Leman, P. J. & Duveen, G. (1996). Developmental differences in children’s understanding of epistemic authority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 557-575.
Leman, P. J. & Duveen, G. (1999). Representations of authority and children’s moral reasoning. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 683-702.
Moscovici, S. & Doise, W. (1994). Conflict and consensus: a general theory of collective decisions. London: Sage.
Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press.
Moscovici, S. (1980). Towards a theory of conversion behaviour. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (pp. 209-239). London: Academic Press.
Moscovici, S. (1985). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2, 3rd Edition (pp. 347-412). New York: Random House.
Mugny, G., De Paolis, P. & Carugati, F. (1984). Social regulations in cognitive development. In W. Doise & A. Palmonari (Eds.), Social interaction in individual development (pp127-146). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
Perret-Clermont, A-N., Brun, J., Saada, E. H. & Schubauer-Leoni, M-L. (1984). Learning: a social actulization and reconstruction of knowledge. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension, Vol. 1 (pp. 84-103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Phelps, E. & Damon, W. (1989). Problem solving with equals: peer collaboration as a context for learning mathematics and spatial concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 639-646.
Piaget, J. (1923). The language and thought of the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgement of the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Roazzi, A. & Bryant, P. (1998). The effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical social interaction on children’s logical inferences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 175-181.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in a social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Russell, J. (1982). Cognitive conflict, transmission and justification: conservation attainment through dyadic interaction. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 140, 283-297.
Russell, J., Mills, I. & Reiff-Musgrove, P. (1990). The role of symmetrical and asymmetrical social conflict in cognitive change. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 58-78.
Saxe, G. B., Guberman, S. R. & Gearhart, M. (1987). Social and developmental processes in children’s understanding of number. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 52, 2.
Siegler, R. S. (1995). How does change occur: A microgenetic study of number conservation. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 225-273.
Tudge, J. R. H. & Rogoff, B. (1989). Peer influences on cognitive development: Piagetian and Vygotskian perspectives. In M.H. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 213-348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tudge, J.R.H. , Winterhoff, P.A. & Hogan, D.M. (1996).The cognitive consequences of collaborative problem solving with and without feedback. Child Development, 67, 2892-2909.
Verba, M. & Winnykamen, F. (1992). Expert-novice interaction: influence of partner status. European Jounral of Psychology of Education, 7, 61-71.
Wertsch, J. & Tulviste, P. (1992). L. S. Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28, 548-557.
Wertsch, J., McNamee, G. D., McLane, J. B. & Budwig, N. A. (1980). The adult-child dyad as a problem solving system. Child Development, 51, 1215-1221.


Details