Recruiting and Retaining Teachers in the UK: An Analysis of Graduate Occupation Choice from the 1960s to the 1990s

Arnaud Chevalier, Peter Dolton and Steven McIntosh

(2006)

Arnaud Chevalier, Peter Dolton and Steven McIntosh (2006) Recruiting and Retaining Teachers in the UK: An Analysis of Graduate Occupation Choice from the 1960s to the 1990s. Economica, 74 (293). pp. 69 - 96. ISSN 1468-0335

Our Full Text Deposits

Full text access: Open

Full Text - 214.96 KB

Links to Copies of this Item Held Elsewhere


Abstract

This paper examines the market for teachers in the UK from 1960 to 2002 using six graduate cohort data sets. We find that whilst there is no strong evidence that teachers are under-paid, the relative wages in teaching compared to alternative professions have a significant impact on the likelihood of graduates choosing to teach. This wage effect is strongest at times of low relative teachers’ wages, or following a period of decline in those wages. It is also strongest for those individuals who have more recently graduated, and for men.

Information about this Version

This is a Draft version
This version's date is: 06/06/2006
This item is peer reviewed

Link to this Version

https://repository.royalholloway.ac.uk/items/c1cf7436-e2d2-429a-af53-360fa896406c/1/

Item TypeJournal Article
TitleRecruiting and Retaining Teachers in the UK: An Analysis of Graduate Occupation Choice from the 1960s to the 1990s
AuthorsChevalier, Arnaud
Dolton, Peter
McIntosh, Steven
Uncontrolled KeywordsTeacher
DepartmentsFaculty of History and Social Science\Economics

Identifiers

doi10.1111/j.1468-0335.2006.00528.x

Deposited by () on 30-Mar-2010 in Royal Holloway Research Online.Last modified on 30-Mar-2010

Notes

(C) 2007 Wiley-Blackwell, whose permission to mount this version for private study and research is acknowledged.  The repository version is the author's final draft.

References

BALLOU, D. and PODGURSKY, M (1995). Recruiting smarter teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 30, 326-338.

 BREWER, D.J. (1996). Career paths and quit decisions: evidence from teaching. Journal of Labor Economics, 14, 313-339.

 BURGESS, S. and CROXSON, B. (2001). The impact of teacher pay reform on pupil attainment: An outline of the CMPO research project on the performance threshold. CMPO WP 01/36, University of Bristol.

 CHEVALIER, A. (2002). Education, motivation and pay of UK graduates, Is it different for girls? European Journal of Education, 37, 347-370.

 ____ and DOLTON, P. (2005). The labour market for teachers.  In S. Machin and A. Vignoles (eds), The Economics of Education in the UK. Cambridge MA: Princeton University Press.

 ____, ____ and MCINTOSH, S. (2004). The job satisfaction of UK teachers. Mimeo, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.

 ____ and WALKER, I. (2001). Further results on the returns to education in the UK. In C. Harmon, I. Walker and N. Westergard-Nielsen (eds.), Education and Earnings in Europe: A Cross Country Analysis of Returns to Education.  Cheltenham, UK and Northampton MA, USA: Edward-Elgar.

 DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND SKILLS (2004). Statistics of Education: School Workforce in England.  London: HMSO.

 DOLTON, P. (1990). The economics of UK teacher supply: the graduate’s decision.  Economic Journal, 100, Conference Papers, 91-104.

 ____ (2005). Teacher supply.  In E. Hanushek and F. Welch (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education.  Amsterdam: North Holland.

 ____ and CHUNG T-P. (2004). The rate of return to teaching.  National Institute Economic Review, 190, 89-104.

 ____ and MAVROMARAS, K. (1994). Intergenerational occupational choice comparisons: the case of teachers in the UK.  Economic Journal, 104, 841-863.

 ____, MCINTOSH, S. and CHEVALIER, A., (2003). Teacher Pay and Performance.  London: Bedford Way Papers, Institute of Education.

 ____ and VAN DER KLAAUW, W. (1995a). Leaving teaching in the UK: a duration analysis.  Economic Journal, 105, 431-444.

 ____ and ____ (1995b). Teaching salaries and teacher retention.  In W. Baumol and W. Becker (eds.),  Assessing Educational Practices: The Contribution of Economics.  Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

 ____ and ____ (1999). The turnover of teachers: a competing risks explanation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 543-552.

 FLYER, F. and ROSEN, S. (1997).  The new economics of teachers and education. Journal of Labor Economics, 15, S104-S139.

 FRIJTERS, P., SHIELDS M. and WHEATLEY PRICE, S. (2004). To teach or not to teach? Panel data evidence on the quitting decision. IZA, Working Paper 1164.

 HANUSHEK, E.A., KAIN, J.F. and RIVKIN, S.G. (1999). Do higher salaries buy better teachers? National Bureau of Economic Research, Working paper 7082.

 HARKNESS S. and MACHIN, S. (1999). Graduate earnings in Britain, 1974-95.  Department for Education and Employment, Research Report RR95.

 HEIMUELLER A., (2004). Public and private sector wage differentials in Scotland: An endogenous switching model.  IZA, Discussion Paper 992.

 MANSKI, C.F. (1987). Academic ability, earnings, and the decision to become a teacher: evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of the High School Class of 1972.  In D. Wise (ed.). Public Sector Payrolls.  Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.

 MONT, D. and REES, D.I. (1996). The influence of classroom characteristics on high school teacher turnover.  Economic Inquiry, 34, 152-167.

 MURNANE, R.J. and OLSEN, R.J. (1989).  The effects of salaries and opportunity costs on duration in teaching: evidence from Michigan. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 347-352.

 ____ and ____ (1990). The effects of salaries and opportunity costs on length of stay in teaching: evidence from North Carolina.  Journal of Human Resources, 25, 106-124.

 NICKELL, S. and QUINTINI, G. (2002).  The consequences of the decline in public sector pay in Britain: a little bit of evidence.  Economic Journal, 112, F107-F118.

 REES, D.I. (1991). Grievance procedure strength and teacher quits. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, 31-43.

 RIVKIN, S., HANUSHEK E. and KAIN J. (2004). Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Mimeo, Hoover Institute, Stanford University.

 ROSENBAUM, P. and RUBIN, D. (1983).  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects.  Biometrika, 70, 41-55.

 SMITHERS, A. and ROBINSON, P. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ decisions to leave the profession.  Department for Education and Skills, Research Report 430.

 STINEBRICKNER, T.R. (1998).  An empirical investigation of teacher attrition.  Economics of Education Review, 17, 127-136.

 ____ (2001).  A dynamic model of teacher labor supply.  Journal of Labor Economics, 19, 196-230.

 THEOBALD, N.D (1990). An examination of the influence of personal, professional, and school district characteristics on public school teacher retention. Economics of Education Review, 9, 241-250.

 ____ and GRITZ, R.M. (1996).  The effects of school district spending priorities on the exit paths of beginning teachers leaving the district.  Economics of Education Review, 15, 11-22.

 ZABALZA, A., TURNBULL, P. and WILLIAMS, G. (1979). The Economics of Teacher Supply. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Details