Job market signaling and screening: An experimental comparison

Dorothea Kubler, Wieland Muller and Hans-Theo Normann

(2004)

Dorothea Kubler, Wieland Muller and Hans-Theo Normann (2004) Job market signaling and screening: An experimental comparison.

Our Full Text Deposits

Full text access: Open

dpe0402.pdf - 1.02 MB

Abstract

We analyze the Spence education game in experimental markets. We compare a signaling and a screening variant, and we analyze the e¤ect of increasing the number of employers from two to three. In all treatments, there is a strong tendency to separate. More e¢cient workers invest more often and employers bid higher for workers who have invested. More e¢cient workers also earn higher wages. Employers’ pro…ts are usually not di¤erent from zero. Increased competition leads to higher wages only in the signaling sessions. We find that workers in the screening sessions invest more often and earn higher wages when there are two employers.

Information about this Version

This is a Accepted version
This version's date is: 2004
This item is not peer reviewed

Link to this Version

https://repository.royalholloway.ac.uk/items/d1bb5549-9f18-80c9-d28f-27f5b8d4932e/1/

Item TypeMonograph (Working Paper)
TitleJob market signaling and screening: An experimental comparison
AuthorsKubler, Dorothea
Muller, Wieland
Normann, Hans-Theo
Uncontrolled Keywordsjob-market signaling; job-market screening; sorting; Bayesian games; experiments.
DepartmentsFaculty of History and Social Science\Economics

Deposited by Leanne Workman (UXYL007) on 12-Oct-2012 in Royal Holloway Research Online.Last modified on 12-Oct-2012

Notes

 

©2004 Hans Normann. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit including © notice, is given to the source.

References


Details