Traditional accountants and business professionals

Carnegie, Garry D. and Napier, Christopher J.

(2010)

Carnegie, Garry D. and Napier, Christopher J. (2010) Traditional accountants and business professionals. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35 (3).

Our Full Text Deposits

Full text access: Open

Full text file - 129.26 KB

Links to Copies of this Item Held Elsewhere


Abstract

Society’s perception of the legitimacy of the accounting profession and its members is grounded in the verbal and visual images of accountants that are projected not only by accountants themselves but also by the media. The paper uses the critical literature on stereotypes to examine how books written for a general readership on Enron and other recent corporate failures portray accountants and accounting, and the implications their authors draw for corporate governance and the survival of the financial system. The paper explores how commentators have analysed the changing activities of accountants (including the rise of consulting) and have contrasted the personalities of “founding fathers” of the US accounting profession with their early 21st-century successors. The paper concludes that changing stereotypes of accountants are evidence of “negative signals of movement” for accounting as a profession.

Information about this Version

This is a Approved version
This version's date is: 4/2010
This item is not peer reviewed

Link to this Version

https://repository.royalholloway.ac.uk/items/2d6646ac-777b-b7ec-9906-07027414fbab/6/

Item TypeJournal Article
TitleTraditional accountants and business professionals
AuthorsCarnegie, Garry D.
Napier, Christopher J.
Uncontrolled KeywordsAccounting profession, Enron, Stereotypes, Professionalization, Auditing, Popular management
DepartmentsFaculty of History and Social Science\Management
Research Groups and Centres\Management\Information and Communication Management

Identifiers

doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.09.002

Deposited by Research Information System (atira) on 18-Nov-2014 in Royal Holloway Research Online.Last modified on 18-Nov-2014


Details